separate the mob_db and mob_db_re

[Brynner]

is there any chances to separate those? just like what they did on rathena. to avoid any conflict for fluxcp. because our current mob_db_re still use the mob_db. he only did is to replace the old one.

not only the mob_db_re also the mob_skill_db_re.

 

[malufett]

why not? +1

 

[malufett]

https://github.com/HerculesWS/Hercules/pull/428

waiting for approval..

 

[Brynner]

wow thank you

 

[Haru]

I'm personally against this (well, now the pull request got merged accidentally, but we are still in time to revert it). Is there a reason to need two separate table names? i.e. it doesn't make much sense to have both tables loaded at once, it'll always be either one or the other.

Edit: if there's a real reason (other than following rAthena on something that sounds like going backwards), please tell, as I can be easily convinced if you have good arguments.