Topic will be closed because topic starter asked for it.
Just an acclaration: even if the validity (or even legality) of the eAmod license can be discussed (and it still is as a matter of fact) as we saw on the topic I linked to (be eAmod diff or not) since it's a modification of a GPLd program (references:
1,
2), but remember Zephyrus_cr still has the copyright for his modifications anyways (
reference) and is allowed to sell them (
reference). You'd also MUST credit Zephyrus if using parts of his work (
reference, or even for politeness).
However, please remember that files such as scripts and the configuration files are not covered by the GPL and that Zephyrus_cr can ship them in whatever license he wants (
reference), so you could be legally prosecuted if found violating any terms of license he could put on them. Files that link statically (in compilation time, be it a diff or new source files) or dinamically (files that do something similar to any .dll or .so on their respective OSes) to existent GPL'd code, such as source files are forcefully covered by the GPL, even if its creator doesn't want to. If its owner prefers to distibute the latter files under whatever license he wanted, he/she must create a new project from scratch, not based in any software such as Athena or Hercules.
This is just a shout out to put forward that, even if I'm not a fan of eAmod myself, I'm asking to please don't steal other's scripts and claim it as yours. You are free to rescript it or use the idea (since these scripts aren't patented and, in case they were, it'd be unprofitable to pay its upkeep costs and could also make you vulnerable to Gravity lawsuits), but stealing code (or maps, palletes or whatever) is bad and I won't allow it to take place on Hercules (we've previously taken down services from people illegally reselling Kami-shi's palettes and will do again if finding anything against their original licenses).
I'm sure Mysterious thought that the topic starter wanted a full rescript for eAmod BGs upon approving the topic (like I also did), not just someone that rips it off and takes full credit (and the money) for it (
bona fide assumption). What we're asking for is a minimum of fairness here.
Topic closed.