harmony users that are using latest version.

Brynner

Brynner

Community Contributors
Messages
563
Points
0
Github
https://github.com/bgamez23
does anyone already know how to remove this warning?

srcmapharmony.c(225): warning C4013: 'chrif_harmony_request' undefined; assuming extern returning int

this is the affected line.

chrif_harmony_request((uint8*)data, id);

thanks in advance.

 
you'd have to convert to hercules format for 2 files i think, but not sure

chrif.h

int (*harmony_request) (uint8 *dat, size_t dat_size);

 
chrif->harmony_request maybe

 
Judas said:
chrif->harmony_request maybe
Click to expand...
the warning become error.

1  error C2039: 'harmony_request' : is not a member of 'chrif_interface'   srcmapharmony.c  225  1  map-server

2  IntelliSense: class "chrif_interface" has no member "harmony_request"   srcmapharmony.c  225  10  map-server

 
possibilities:

function is not define in .h files

function has a return type but no possible return value

function is not define in the .c file if its an static function

function has a return type that is not compatible to the function data type

function's parameter doesn't match with the definition 

IMO..
default_biggrin.png


default_ani_meow.gif


 
is 

int (*harmony_request) (uint8 *dat, size_t dat_size);

 
 
placed in the right area?
 
malufett said:
possibilities:

function is not define in .h files

function has a return type but no possible return value

function is not define in the .c file if its an static function

function has a return type that is not compatible to the function data type

function's parameter doesn't match with the definition 

IMO..
default_biggrin.png


default_ani_meow.gif
Click to expand...
damn you

i was going to reply

anyway

He's right

:|

// No new line :|

 
malufett said:
possibilities:

function is not define in .h files

function has a return type but no possible return value

function is not define in the .c file if its an static function

function has a return type that is not compatible to the function data type

function's parameter doesn't match with the definition 

IMO..
default_biggrin.png


default_ani_meow.gif
Click to expand...
thanks for the explantion.

Judas said:
is 

int (*harmony_request) (uint8 *dat, size_t dat_size);

 
 
placed in the right area?
Click to expand...
thank. it works.

i need to edit the harmony.c

from

chrif_harmony_request((uint8*)data, id);

to

chrif->harmony_request((uint8*)data, id);

and edit the chrif.h

int (*harmony_request) (uint8 *dat, size_t dat_size);

 
Last two versions harmony have a lot of bugs, and problems:

  • fps bug
  • liknz & other software for ndl and complete autopots + clicker + ndl + other effects in one soft work fine.
  • harmony do not block memory reading, and injection
  • harmony only read latest signatures of cheat software.
  • harmony owner wont fix FPS (decrease when a lot of players at same screen) bug, and other problems.
  • harmony owner do not support fastly, he just answer after 1-2 weeks.

That why i think harmony is bad product to protect server.

But there is no alternative way to block cheat software.

How work harmony?

  • it's check hash-sums of files in hdata.grf to "protect" against ndl. But new ways in nodelay based on sprite freezing.
  • It's check hash-sums of .exe, it's not helpful.
  • It's know already about some software (by signatures) but they do not want to protect memory addresses against read/write ways.
  • Harmony has tunnel where transfer data is encrypted by AES (blue fish) algoritm. But this way is not good against new cheat scene. Where openkore by some people with some perl modules can bypass this method and connect to the server.
  • Harmony check hash-sum for each software what they know....


Sorry guys, SIrius can say another version, but i say true. It's not good protection. You pay for brand, not for protection engine. Harmony was good at 2009-10;

For this time is most suckest anticheat engine what i ever seen before.

What to do?

- Wait for good developers like Magnum Anticheat and use their protection.

Protection must:

- Revers engeniereng most dangerous (good) cheat software and understand how it work.

- They must block API calls to memory.

- They must check everytime all files in game to detect modification.

- They must HIDE without threads, pids protected Ragnarok.exe;

- They must make own virtual keyboard what block whole WINAPI (SendKey('Button')
default_wink.png
and allow only processrunned virtual button.

- They must ask to help increase their protection "level" at professional cheaters. Romedic, ahk, ROPS it's trivial things.

- Protection must be CHEAP.

- Cheap & good protection = many clients, many money, ro ALIVE.

 
The patch had an issue with a newline @ chrif.h, which was making it not apply the patch.

You should always run "git apply --check patch-name.patch" to check wether the patch works or not (and avoid breaking your installation)

@ neqste

Everyone can have diffrent opinions regarding what a good protection is, if Harmony works for someone, then its good by all means.

So far the few cases I've had of bypass have been quickly patched, there is no protection that works 100% since new ways of bypassing are always being created. What matters is how responsive the developer behind the project is. While Sirius has on the most part always replied quickly to bypasses and support requests (Except a few ocassions where he has gone out of town or focused on his studies), I dont think there is much to complain about
default_tongue.png


 
@Xgear i don't use the patch since it is not compatible on the latest version. my source that i'm using is working but there is a warning issue upon on compiling the server.

 
Xgear said:
The patch had an issue with a newline @ chrif.h, which was making it not apply the patch.

You should always run "git apply --check patch-name.patch" to check wether the patch works or not (and avoid breaking your installation)

@ neqste

Everyone can have diffrent opinions regarding what a good protection is, if Harmony works for someone, then its good by all means.

So far the few cases I've had of bypass have been quickly patched, there is no protection that works 100% since new ways of bypassing are always being created. What matters is how responsive the developer behind the project is. While Sirius has on the most part always replied quickly to bypasses and support requests (Except a few ocassions where he has gone out of town or focused on his studies), I dont think there is much to complain about
default_tongue.png
Click to expand...
I'm not talking about the ideal variant. Harmony protection is outdated. It's cannot help against trivial things. 200$ for nothing. I hope, Sirius notice that. He must rethink harmony protection, and understand main, there no more romedics, there need protect whole memory! Do not need to block some versions of program. Need to make global protection with memory virtualization & encryption. 

Romedic, autohotkey it's very easy software. But ro cheat scene is larger then this cheats. Much larger (i know already more than 10 applications what maded for ragnarok online, and all of them read/write to the same memory addresses);

 
Last edited by a moderator:
@neqste Well, I agree Harmony is quite outdated and the other post was kinda ontopic but please, avoid deviating the original topic purpose.

@bgamez23, did you solve your problem? I think Harmony community would help you better address this issue anyways since here in Hercules we don't have its source code, but will be glad on helping as much as we can on it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top