Help With some changes in skills

[Clare 0]

Hello, I need help to change some things in my emulator with respect to some skills, I thank anyone who can help.

 

1 - I would like to make the Creator class to use the skills

 

Full Protection

Chemical Protection Armor

Chemical Protection Weapon

Chemical Protection Shield

Chemical Protection Helm

 

without it is with equipped items, and when using these skills cancel the status of skill "strip" of the Stalker class

 

Currently these skills the Creator class can not be used if the item is not equipped, and not remove the effect/icon of skill "Strip"

 

2 - I would like to make the Stalker class when using the skill "Strip"

the equipment may not be equipped again until the duration of the skill effect Strip ends because currently the skill Strip removes only the item but the same can be equiped immediately.




 

Edited June 30, 2015 by Suzuya

[CarlosHenrq 13]

That's my patch for brAthena. You can add to your source, may need some changes if you have other sources changes. It's better you add manually at your source.

 

@edit

 

The final code...

config.fullprotect.diff

Edited June 30, 2015 by CarlosHenrq

[Garr 117]

Actually I believe 2nd is a bug, as items are not supposed to be equippable in the slot until strip effect ends...

[Clare 0]

Hi Garr, Thanks for answering

I believe the two are bugs, but didn't venture to say that way.

 

I remember the skill Chemical Protection be used by my players (a few years ago in a pre-re server) as a way to "cancel" the effect of the strip, but without being able to utilize the Chemical Protection skills without the need this item equipped, it becomes impossible to use a skill under the influence of "strip" for nullify the effect.

 

You know how to solve these problems?

[CarlosHenrq 13]

Hi, i believe this both 'issue' are not bug.

 

For the first:

The logical is simple, you can't protect what you don't have. So, you can't protect a weapon if you don't have a weapon equipped.

This sounds good for me.

 

For the second:

This is not a bug. You may testing it with a high group_id account. In the code, you have:

 

In: pc.c

Ln: ~922

Function: int pc_isequip(struct map_session_data *sd,int n)

	if(pc_has_permission(sd, PC_PERM_USE_ALL_EQUIPMENT))		return 1;

 

This test occours before any check from strip status. So, if your group_id has permission to equip any itens, it'll ignore the strip from stalker.

Can you test with a low group_id account for us?

Edited June 30, 2015 by CarlosHenrq

[Clare 0]

 

Hi, i believe this both 'issue' are not bug.

 

For the first:

The logical is simple, you can't protect what you don't have. So, you can't protect a weapon if you don't have a weapon equipped.

This sounds good for me.

 

For the second:

This is not a bug. You may testing it with a high group_id account. In the code, you have:

 

In: pc.c

Ln: ~922

Function: int pc_isequip(struct map_session_data *sd,int n)

	if(pc_has_permission(sd, PC_PERM_USE_ALL_EQUIPMENT))		return 1;

 

This test occours before any check from strip status. So, if your group_id has permission to equip any itens, it'll ignore the strip from stalker.

Can you test with a low group_id account for us?

 

Omg, Sorry for the second really are the group id, but for the first you can help-me to made this change?

[Clare 0]

thank you very much, worked perfectly!!!
I Love you *------*