Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
memoryss

GPL violation?

Recommended Posts

depends.

 

They are allowed to sell it, but they have to supply all the src files along with it as well. They can't just supply the binary files

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, Inkfish originally worked in Athena projects but this is the same as what happened to eAmod about a year ago.

 

You can freely modify the emulator and charge whatever you want for it, but you can't re-release the software under more restrictive license the original software has. So as long as the GPL license is intact and he doesn't threat people without a "legal" copy of his software as eAmod owner did (under GPL licenses it's legally impossible to pirate a software) it's completely legal.

 

But if any customer pays for the modification then decides to redistribute it for free, he's in the absolute right to do so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying.

 

I have downloaded the test ver., and I cannot find any sorce code/GPL license included.

 

6. Conveying Non-Source Forms.  You may convey a covered work in object code form under the termsof sections 4 and 5, provided that you also convey themachine-readable Corresponding Source under the terms of this License,in one of these ways
Edited by memoryss

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.