Brynner 34 Posted December 27, 2014 (edited) is there any chances to separate those? just like what they did on rathena. to avoid any conflict for fluxcp. because our current mob_db_re still use the mob_db. he only did is to replace the old one. not only the mob_db_re also the mob_skill_db_re. Edited December 27, 2014 by bgamez23 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
malufett 247 Posted December 28, 2014 why not? +1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
malufett 247 Posted December 28, 2014 https://github.com/HerculesWS/Hercules/pull/428 waiting for approval.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brynner 34 Posted December 28, 2014 wow thank you Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Haru 290 Posted December 28, 2014 I'm personally against this (well, now the pull request got merged accidentally, but we are still in time to revert it). Is there a reason to need two separate table names? i.e. it doesn't make much sense to have both tables loaded at once, it'll always be either one or the other. Edit: if there's a real reason (other than following rAthena on something that sounds like going backwards), please tell, as I can be easily convinced if you have good arguments. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
