Old style of Status Immunity through LUK

[apuadofrancisco 1]

HI Devs,

I already read some topics about this. but i cant find exact answer for this issue.

 

I want to resist all negative status if you have 235 and above luk. and it also changes the status duration.

eg:i have 230 luk, i only freeze about .5sec

 

in my old Status.conf before i moved to hercules... here's my configure

 

 

// Adjustment for the natural rate of resistance from status changes.

// If 50, status defense is halved, and you need twice as much stats to block

// them (eg: 200 vit to completely block stun)

pc_status_def_rate: 35

mob_status_def_rate: 100

 

// Required luk to gain inmunity to status changes.

// Luk increases resistance by closing the gap between natural resist and max 

// linearly. This setting indicates required luk to gain complete immunity.

// Eg: 40 vit -> 40% resist. 150 luk -> +50% of the missing gap. 

//     So 40% + (50% of 60%) = 70%

pc_luk_status_def: 235

mob_luk_status_def: 100

 

Now, my question is... where i can find this configuration? 
 

 

// Required luk to gain inmunity to status changes.

// Luk increases resistance by closing the gap between natural resist and max 

// linearly. This setting indicates required luk to gain complete immunity.

// Eg: 40 vit -> 40% resist. 150 luk -> +50% of the missing gap. 

//     So 40% + (50% of 60%) = 70%

pc_luk_status_def: 235

mob_luk_status_def: 100

Thanks!

[apuadofrancisco 1]

bump!

[apuadofrancisco 1]

bump devs!

[apuadofrancisco 1]

up

[evilpuncker 504]

you can change them directly in sources from this line onward

[apuadofrancisco 1]

you can change them directly in sources from this line onward

 

Alright thanks, ill try this one!

@@evilpuncker, 

 

Can you explain to me this lines?

 

sc_def = st->vit*100; --> 100 meas player need to have 100 vit?

sc_def2 = st->luk*10 + SCDEF_LVL_DIFF(bl, src, 99, 10); --> can you explain this line? especially those in parameter?

tick_def2 = st->luk*10;  --> is this the duration time right? still confused..

 

Thanks!

Edited June 1, 2015 by apuadofrancisco

[apuadofrancisco 1]

Hi @evilpunker, any reply with this?

[apuadofrancisco 1]

bump :/

[Noil 1]

@@apuadofrancisco

 

Hey there check this line

[apuadofrancisco 1]

@@Noil

 

alright, ill check this.

Thanks!

[Noil 1]

@@Noil

 

alright, ill check this.

 

Thanks!

You are welcome

[apuadofrancisco 1]

up

[daanizin 0]

up