evilpuncker 503 Posted June 22, 2013 (edited) [*]Cannot pick up items [*]Cannot buy/sell items at npc (opening the trade windows is okay tho) [*]Do not gain experience [*]Cannot use skills disable_pickup disable_store disable_exp disable_skill_usage old patch here, made by clydelion http://pastebin.com/E7ABJ3cC Edited September 21, 2014 by evilpuncker 2 anacondaq and ScriptingPhailure reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Samuel 83 Posted June 22, 2013 +1 these would be great additions Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yommy 265 Posted June 22, 2013 there should be some notification, "Drops have been disabled on this map" etc otherwise players will be reporting them as bugs Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Emistry 145 Posted June 22, 2013 is this setting for map zone ? or group id ? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jedzkie 58 Posted June 22, 2013 +1 to this! HOHOHO Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gepard 55 Posted June 22, 2013 is this setting for map zone ? or group id ? Groups, I suppose. For maps, there are already mapflags like noexp, noskill etc Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
evilpuncker 503 Posted June 22, 2013 there should be some notification, "Drops have been disabled on this map" etc otherwise players will be reporting them as bugs they are for groups my dear yommy <3 as gepard said Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jaBote 438 Posted June 22, 2013 Yeah, this could remove some cumbersomeness that makes trying to restrict that from your GMs by other means. On my side, I made an unequippable headgear which weighed 111% the original GM's weight capacity, and assigned it to the GM via the DB then removed any statpoint left. This way the GM had all those permissions applied because it was 1/1 novice without even basic skills. 1 evilpuncker reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Xgear 44 Posted June 22, 2013 I am personally not too fond of the idea, not that its bad, but it kind of feels like somethings are being pushed a bit too far in regards to customization. I am fine with some new features and what not, but I don't think it is that much of a good idea to add every feature (For as useful as it can be) cluttering up the code with not-so-much-deal-breaking configurations/options. With the plugin system and any improvements it might have in the future, adding custom modifications is only going to be a matter of minutes, so everyone can freely mess up or overcomplicate their own installation without overcluttering the code with stuff that might not be really needed by most people. Please note though, this particular change might not be too big to add (And my comment is not regarding this particular suggestion, but more of a common thing), but its just I've been seeing some "Make this a builtin feature" more and more often everyday... 1 evilpuncker reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ind 945 Posted June 23, 2013 I sort of agree with the above (perhaps the time to make this could be best invested in making group permissions hpm-friendly so a plugin could do this instead), but if there is demand for it to be built in, sure, in my opinion. there should be some notification, "Drops have been disabled on this map" etc otherwise players will be reporting them as bugs AYEE FEEDBACK <3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
evilpuncker 503 Posted July 2, 2013 bump for more votes and feedback Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ossi0110 200 Posted July 2, 2013 +1 good idea Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quesoph 105 Posted July 2, 2013 Good idea.. +1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ToiletMaster 3 Posted July 9, 2013 +1 to this, i'm not sure what problems it might caused on the back-end part, but definitely this is much more useful to all server owners in restricting. Aside from the back-end source code part, I can't see how this can be a bad choice lol. 1 evilpuncker reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Angelmelody 221 Posted July 9, 2013 agree to add more useful permissions 1 evilpuncker reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
evilpuncker 503 Posted September 29, 2013 I'll make a pull request since Ind seems to be busy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
evilpuncker 503 Posted February 11, 2014 I was not able to made a pull request, so I'm bumping it to first page since it got many supporters (I think?!) so I don't mind that devs will mind implementing it (but please don't make it a plugin ) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kyeme 71 Posted February 11, 2014 (but please don't make it a plugin ) Agree ^ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pan 87 Posted February 13, 2014 I am personally not too fond of the idea, not that its bad, but it kind of feels like somethings are being pushed a bit too far in regards to customization. I am fine with some new features and what not, but I don't think it is that much of a good idea to add every feature (For as useful as it can be) cluttering up the code with not-so-much-deal-breaking configurations/options. With the plugin system and any improvements it might have in the future, adding custom modifications is only going to be a matter of minutes, so everyone can freely mess up or overcomplicate their own installation without overcluttering the code with stuff that might not be really needed by most people. Please note though, this particular change might not be too big to add (And my comment is not regarding this particular suggestion, but more of a common thing), but its just I've been seeing some "Make this a builtin feature" more and more often everyday... I sort of agree with the above (perhaps the time to make this could be best invested in making group permissions hpm-friendly so a plugin could do this instead), but if there is demand for it to be built in, sure, in my opinion.I agree with XGear and Ind, it'd better if this was a plugin and not a built-in feature, it just seems more things to do maintenance and clutter our main code-base. Let's just wait what a high-up has to say about this... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Samuel 83 Posted February 13, 2014 Hmm could this help? https://github.com/HerculesWS/Hercules/commit/e1a0059919dbc4f5c7e803a496b8d150c0a070f5 there's just no sample on how to use this in plugin :-P Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Virtue 10 Posted February 14, 2014 i think i actually have some permissions from clydelion from before, but i can't find them but it also restricts the use of skills storage and all that ill update my post when i see it but this would really be a nice addition! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hadeszeus 15 Posted March 14, 2014 Good to have. +1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites